🔗 Share this article

Nicolas Cage is likely the ideal pick for a bold horror film centered on the biblical figure, however not for the reasons some fans may think. Truthfully, Cage doesn't even play Jesus in the new film: his character is credited only as The Carpenter. Cage is cast as the Joseph in this tale, striving to keep his beliefs while the teenage character (played by Noah Jupe), their teenage adopted son, commences to show supernatural abilities. The explanation it’s difficult to imagine any other leading star playing this part is that while the role becomes weighed down with numerous difficulties, Cage himself appears almost moving confident that this murky, grim feature is a valuable project.

Cage's Recent Career Choices

Nicolas Cage has allocating his time more judiciously in recent years. He still does additional projects than most casual fans will ever see — for instance, did you know that he has completed three separate Westerns recently? — yet he also mixes in high-profile independent films for example Dream Scenario, Pig, and Longlegs. The Carpenter’s Son seems like a similar project, because it’s genre-adjacent, likely to stir debate, and approaches a over-the-top description quite seriously.

Movie's Plot and Execution

Sadly, filmmaker the director fails to repay that serious attention. The Carpenter’s Son starts from a engagingly rootless setting, presented as inspired by an apocryphal lost gospel about the early years of Jesus. Cage's character, the maternal figure, and their son travel frequently, fearful of faith-based hostility or suspicion about their son's strange powers. “Calamity follows us,” Cage mournfully notes. It goes on as sinister entities target the household at their new home, getting a jump-start on that familiar Biblical temptation for The Boy.

At times, the film resembles an Exorcist-style possession movie, but none of the lead characters are clearly inhabited. On the contrary, they become more and more distant from each other, while these forces influence a local young woman (the actress, named an outsider) that The Boy forms a relationship with, and provides all troubling visions of a grim future. The Carpenter notably struggles with his place in the narrative, at times scolding the son he doesn't completely grasp.

Discussion and Caution

The subject matter is apt to court controversy, and the director handles it with much sensitivity — overly, possibly. The concept of a young man facing his destined offering and lured by mysterious forces is indeed terrifying, but Nathan may be wary of appearing sensational and keen to signal his intentions, therefore he regularly retreats into gloomily threatening filming. The figures brood incessantly — FKA Twigs, who displayed genuine potential in another movie, of all things — surrenders her role to her religious attire, at times punctuated by a few disturbing frightening scenes.

Cage's Acting and Movie's Flaws

Meanwhile, Cage dabbles in precisely the type of overacting that his more snickering appreciators could be expecting. There is a moment (also included) in previews where Cage erupts and screams “My faith has been shattered!” Should such of dramatic explosion is part of a biblical thriller, possibly a more openly absurd style would take better advantage of the actor's readiness to go over the top when necessary. On the other hand, The Carpenter’s Son echoes the less successful low-budget films the actor filmed through much of that period — excluding the campy action films so much as the dramas and ghost stories that typically appear interesting, and often contain several notable actor's highlights, but ultimately feel like, frankly, low-budget DTV material.

Truthfully, a number of those, though not as grand, were easier to view as a whole. At this point I need to disregard my own dogma, not faith-based but career-related: Years back, a respected mentor urged me to remove adjectives like “boring” or “dull” from my analytical lexicon. These words express scant but a subjective and broadly stated lack of patience, withdrawing from the duty of vibrantly communicating the mental and emotional experience of watching a particular movie. It's challenging to communicate tedium without appearing dull yourself. It's just as unclear as terming a movie “engaging.” “Say more,” in other words.

However, I admit, I was bored for a large part of The Carpenter’s Son. To the movie’s non-exploitative credit, it is a churchy kind of stultification, not for The Carpenter’s Son is preachy, but because it takes a type of dutiful submission to watch it. Eventually early on, the film settles into a cyclic tempo of ongoing suffering, and does not